Published
on
By
By Kester Kenn Klomegah
Russia has evaded neighbouring Ukraine located in Eastern Europe. As one of the former Soviet republics looking to climb onto the global stage and steadfastly develop the future, it, therefore, sets ambition to join the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) and the European Union (EU).
On the other hand, these two directions of its ambitions have angered Russia. As already known, Ukraine is in Eastern Europe and shares a border with Russia. It used to be part of the Soviet Union but became an independent country in 1991.
Under the directorship of Russian President Vladimir Putin, and approved by the both Federal Council and the State Duma, the Russian collective made the decision to hold a special military operation in response to the address of leaders of Donbass and Luhansk republics, both in eastern Ukraine.
Putin launched the “special military operation” repeating a number of unfounded claims, alleging that Ukraine’s democratically elected government had been responsible for eight years of genocide.
Putin feverishly seeks to demilitarize and denazify Ukraine. As a result of the waging war on Ukraine, Russia has to suffer from a raft of sanctions imposed by various foreign countries including the United States, Canada, Britain, the European Union and down to Australia. The results of the waging war on Ukraine.
The longer-term economic consequences for the rest of the world will be far less severe than they are for Russia, but they will still be a persistent challenge for policymakers, noted Jason Furman, a former chair of U.S. President Barack Obama’s Council of Economic Advisers.
He wrote in his opinion article published by Project Syndicate: “The medium- and long-term consequences for the global economy of Russia’s military operation in Ukraine will depend on choices. By launching the operation, Russia has already made one terrible choice.”
While the sanctions take their bites and associated snow-balling effects, it has opened huge significant potential opportunities for a number of African countries. In the first place, researchers at Oxford Economics Africa believe that Russia’s invasion of Ukraine could increase wheat prices in Angola and Mozambique, but the rise in oil and gas prices benefits the finances of these two African countries.
“Both Angola and Mozambique have a very limited level of trade with Russia and Ukraine; Angola imports wheat and yeast from Russia, while Mozambique imports a significant amount of wheat and a small amount of refined oil from Russia,” Oxford Economics Africa analyst who follows these two African economies told Mozambique News Agency.
“It appears that, at least for now, Angola is generally benefiting from higher oil and gas prices, which are partially driven by the conflict,” Gerrit van Rooyen said in remarks from Paarl, South Africa. Higher oil prices are positive for government revenues,” the analyst added. If the rise is sustained, “this could increase investment in Angola and lower debt levels faster than previously anticipated.”
“If gas prices remain high due to the conflict, this will be positive for investments in Mozambique’s liquefied natural gas [LNG],” his analysis continues, since “the profits from the natural gas in the Rovuma basin could be greater than the risk of armed extremist insurgency in the region.”
Despite the benefits for the public accounts of the two Portuguese-speaking states, van Rooyen points out that, for the average citizen, the disadvantages outweigh the advantages. Higher oil and wheat prices could be bad news for consumers, as inflation, which is already high in these countries, particularly in Angola and it is, however, expected to increase more than initially expected.
Monitoring media reports have indicated that a few oil and gas producing African countries have the possibility, if well-exploited, to supply Europe. For example, Algeria’s state energy firm is ready to supply Europe with more gas in view of a possible decline due to the Russian invasion of Ukraine.
Sonatrach CEO Toufik Hakkar said the firm was ready to pump additional gas to the EU from its surplus via the Transmed pipeline linking Algeria to Italy. Sonatrach is “a reliable gas supplier for the European market and is willing to support its long-term partners in the event of difficult situations,” Hakkar said and was reported by the daily Liberte.
Hakkar nonetheless said this would be contingent on the availability of a surplus of gas or liquified natural gas [LNG], but have to fix its “contractual engagements” with the importing partner for the supplies to the European market.
Nonetheless, Algeria could only compensate for the decline in Russian gas supply by offering a maximum of two or three million additional cubic meters. Algeria plans to develop new reserves of shale gas. In January, Sonatrach said it would invest US$40 billion into oil exploration, production and refinement, as well as gas prospecting and extraction, between 2022 and 2026.
Arguments whether Africans can take advantage to increase their business, especially in oil and gas, are still varied. “For Africa, it’s again, it’s an opportunity, it presents that window of opportunity for African countries to see how they can increase their production capacity and meet the need of global demands of crude oil,” says Isaac Botti, a public finance expert told Voice of America.
However, Africa’s production combined accounts for less than a tenth of total global output. Nigeria is Africa’s largest producer of oil followed by Libya. Other notable producers are Algeria and Angola.
Algerian state-owned oil and gas giant said it would supply Europe if Russian exports dwindled as a result of the crisis, Botti noted and added that it’s a good example for other African nations. “We need to develop our capacity to produce locally, we need to look at various trade agreements that are existing,” he said.
For years African oil producers including Nigeria have been struggling to meet required daily output levels. Many experts, including Botti, worry strongly that African producers may struggle to fit into the big market with increasing global demands for crude oil.
Instead of African business to the United States and Europe, some researchers and experts have shown concern about the level of impact of the Russia-Ukraine conflict on Africa. Admittedly, they noted in their separate discussions that the war in Ukraine could further push oil prices up and increase inflation in Africa.
From an African agriculture perspective, the impact of the war will be felt in the near term through the global agriculture commodity prices channel. A rise in prices will be beneficial for farmers, especially for grain and oilseed farmers, the surge in prices presents an opportunity for financial gains.
In his research analysis, Wandile Sihlobo, Senior Fellow at the Department of Agricultural Economics, Stellenbosch University, wrote that some countries on the continent, such as South Africa, benefit from exporting fruit to Russia. In 2020 Russia accounted for 7% of South Africa’s citrus exports in value terms. And it accounted for 12% of South Africa’s apples and pears exports in the same year – the countries’ second-largest market.
But from Africa’s perspective, Russia and Ukraine’s agricultural imports from the continent are marginal – averaging only US$1,6 billion – in the past three years. The dominant products are fruits, tobacco, coffee, and beverages in both countries. Every agricultural role-player is keeping an eye on the developments in the Black Sea region. The impact will be felt in other regions, such as the Middle East and Asia, which also import a substantial volume of grains and oilseeds from Ukraine and Russia. They too will be directly affected by the disruption in trade, according to Sihlobo.
There is still a lot that’s not known about the geopolitical challenges that lie ahead. But for African countries, there are reasons to be worried given their dependency on grains imports. In the near term, countries are likely to see the impact through a surge in prices, rather than an actual shortage of the commodities. Other wheat exporting countries such as Canada, Australia and the US stand to benefit from any potential near term surge in demand.
“The last time we had a windfall from oil prices related to war was in 1991, during the Gulf War. We know it will directly impact the price of crude oil. The revenue may increase, but since we have shifted oil investment to multinational companies, they are more likely to reap greater revenues than the country itself.” Professor Abdul-Ganiyu Garba of the Department of Economics Ahmadu Bello University Zaria said.
“If there is an increase in crude oil prices, it means inflation will grow globally, the cost of most of our imports will also rise, which will transfer to the domestic crisis,” the Nigerian economist added. Commodity prices have skyrocketed in many African countries, making life more challenging for millions of people.
“People start starving once these countries fight because they [global powers] presented themselves to African countries as mother countries,” Dox Deezol, a South African entrepreneur and artist in Johannesburg, told DW.
As a member of BRICS [Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa] — the world’s five emerging economies — South Africa was relatively silent when Russia annexed Crimea in 2014. However, the South African government has urged restraint this time.
“South Africa is integrated into the global economy. So the war’s impact on the global economy, as we have seen in the soaring prices of oil and energy generally, will affect South Africa because when the world sneezes, South Africa catches a cold,” Professor Siphamandla Zondi, an international relations expert and head of BRICS studies at the University of Johannesburg, told DW.
It’s not just the oil prices that could impact Africa. For example, there is significant agricultural trade between African countries and Russia and Ukraine. Some say Africa’s trade with Russia and Ukraine could also be at stake. In 2020, African countries imported agricultural products worth US$4 billion from Russia. Wheat accounted for approximately 90% of these imports. Egypt was the largest importer, followed by Sudan, Nigeria, Tanzania, Algeria, Kenya, and South Africa.
Similarly, Ukraine exported agricultural products worth US$2.9 billion to Africa in 2020. Wheat accounted for roughly 48% of this, maize 31%, and sunflower oil, barley, and soybeans accounted for the remainder. The ongoing war could affect supply chains and raise the cost of imports. It is also unclear what effect the sanctions imposed by the US and its allies on Russia will have on Africa-Russia trade relations.
The repercussions of the conflict are readily felt in other economic sectors. Media reports indicated tourism and aviation business are also negatively affected. In terms of education and training, many African governments, ministries and departments struggle to evacuate their students and nationals from war-torn Ukraine. From basic research for this article, Ukraine has emerged as a choice destination for African students, especially in the fields of medicine and engineering.
According to Ukraine’s Ministry of Education and Science, some 180,000 international students study in Ukraine with the largest number from India, followed by Morocco, Azerbaijan, Turkmenistan, Egypt, Nigeria, South Africa, Tanzania, Zimbabwe and Ghana. The fact is that Africa remains deeply concerned over the escalation of the conflict in Ukraine. Nearly all African foreign ministries have expressed their deepest displeasure over the violation of the territorial integrity of Ukraine and categorically blamed Russia for creating instability in the world.
While looking the future African business to the United States, Europe and Asia, the current Chair of the African Union and President of Senegal, Macky Sall, and the Chairperson of the African Union Commission, Moussa Faki Mahamat, have expressed their extreme concern at the dangerous situation created in Ukraine. They called on the Russian Federation and any other regional or international actor to respect international law, the territorial integrity and the national sovereignty of Ukraine.
The Chair of the African Union and the Chairperson of the African Union Commission urged Russia and Ukraine to establish an immediate ceasefire and to open political negotiations without much delay. It should be under the auspices of the United Nations, in order to preserve the world from the consequences of planetary conflict, and in the interests of peace and stability in international relations in service of all the peoples of the world. Some tough actions are still expected from the Security Council of the United Nations.
NGX Group Optimises Profitability as PAT Grows 22.2%
NNPC JV Signs Deal to Supply 70mscf Gas to Dangote Fertilizer
Intensifying Russia-Ukraine Conflict Pushes Oil Prices Higher
Published
on
By
By Adedapo Adesanya
The bull remained on the floor of the NASD Over-the-Counter (OTC) Securities Exchange on Friday, March 4, following a 0.6 per cent rise.
The favourable outcome came on the back of gains recorded by Niger Delta Exploration and Production (NDEP) and Central Securities Clearing Systems (CSCS) Plc.
NDEP Plc made a N10 or 5 per cent rise to close at N200.00 per unit as against N190.00 per unit it closed a day earlier, while CSCS Plc saw its equity grow by 13 kobo or 0.7 per cent to close at N18.41 per unit in contrast to N18.28 per unit it closed at the previous session.
As a result of this, the NASD unlisted securities index (NSI) moved up by 4.33 points to 730.61 points from 726.28 points, while the market capitalisation gained N3.66 billion to wrap the day at N618.66 billion compared with N615 billion it was quoted on Thursday.
At the market yesterday, the trading volume slid by 99.2 per cent as a total of 121,500 units of shares exchanged hands compared with 15.2 million units transacted on Thursday.
At the close of business, the trading value depreciated by 31.9 per cent to N5.9 million from the previous day’s turnover of N8.6 million, while the number of deals depreciated by 55.6 per cent as only four deals were carried out compared to the nine deals executed at the previous session.
CSCS Plc remained as the most traded security by volume on a year-to-date basis with 656.7 million units sold for N13.8 billion. AG Mortgage Plc came next with 32.0 million units valued at N16.7 million, while NASD Plc came in third place as it has so far traded 21.9 million units of stocks valued at N215.7 million.
Also, CSCS Plc was also the most active stock by value on a year-to-date basis with the sale of 656.7 million units worth N13.8 billion, followed by VFD Group Plc with 916,161 units worth N331.5 million, and FrieslandCampina WAMCO Nigeria Plc, with the sale of 2.2 million units traded for N264.7 million.
Published
on
By
By Adedapo Adesanya
The Naira depreciated by 0.04 per cent or 17 kobo against the US Dollar on Friday at the Investors and Exporters (I&E) segment of the foreign exchange (FX) market, closing at N416.67/$1 compared with N416.50/$1 it transacted at the previous session.
According to data obtained from the FMDQ Securities Exchange, the value of forex transactions at the trading session stood at $115.26 million.
But against the Pound Sterling, the Naira appreciated yesterday by N4.02 to trade at N553.14/£1 compared to the previously traded rate of N557.16/£1 and against the Euro as the domestic currency gained N4.92 to settle at N456.98/€1 in contrast to N461.92/€1 it was traded on Thursday.
At the Peer-2-Peer (P2P) segment of the FX market, the Nigerian currency traded flat against the greenback on Friday, remaining unchanged at N574/$1.
At the cryptocurrency market, things are still bad as all the 10 benchmarked tokens tracked by Business Post across some trading platforms closed lower during the session.
The largest cryptocurrency by market capitalisation, Bitcoin (BTC), depreciated by 6.1 per cent to close at N24,505,920, Binance Coin (BNB) also recorded a 6.1 per cent loss to sell at N155,358.84, Dash (DASH) went down by 5.7 per cent to sell for N51,337.50, Litecoin (LTC) retreated by 5.4 per cent to quote at N65,325.81, while Solana (SOL) dropped 4.8 per cent to close at N51,499.07.
In addition, Ethereum (ETH) declined on Friday by 3.9 per cent to sell at N1,628,089, Cardano (ADA) also depreciated by 3.9 per cent to trade at N568.83, Ripple (XRP) went down by 3.1 per cent to trade at N489, Dogecoin (DOGE) went down by 2.9 per cent to finish at N80.4, while the US Dollar Tether (USDT) fell by 0.1 per cent to settle at N587.82.
Published
on
By
By Adedapo Adesanya
Oil prices soared higher by about 7 per cent on Friday with new reports that the United States was considering a ban on Russian crude oil.
This shot the Brent crude futures higher by 6.93 per cent or $7.65 to $118.11 per barrel and raised the US West Texas Intermediate (WTI) crude futures by 7.44 per cent or $8.01 to $115.68 per barrel.
That was the highest close for Brent since February 2013 and for WTI since September 2008. During the week, Brent rose to its highest intraday since May 2012 and WTI its highest since September 2008.
The administration of Mr Joe Biden is now said to be looking at what can be done immediately to make up for Russian crude oil, should they take that route, White House Council of Economic Advisors chair Mrs Cecilia Rouse said on Friday.
“We are considering a range of options, but what’s really essential is that we maintain a steady supply of global energy,” she said at a press briefing.
Previously, the White House had dismissed the idea of banning Russian crude oil imports, pointing out that doing so could cause oil and gasoline prices to rise even more than they already had.
Now, they have to contend with the possibility of picking both extremes as a ban on Russian crude oil and crude products could send oil—and petrol prices even higher while stoking inflationary reactions.
Crude futures have soared more than 20 per cent since the United States and allies sanctioned Russia following its February 24 invasion of Ukraine.
Russian oil sales have been disrupted, with sellers finding it very difficult to make deals even as they offer massive discounts to benchmark Brent crude.
This development offset whatever concerns that talks between Iran officials and the US government on reviving a nuclear deal could be signed soon.
However, any agreement will not immediately allow Iran to legally export oil as compliance with the agreement would take a few months to verify.
Most refiners around the world have also shunned Iranian oil for several years and they would need two to three months to finalize technical arrangements to enable imports from Iran to resume, analysts said.
Iran has tens of millions of barrels of oil in storage that can be released once its compliance with the nuclear agreement is verified, but some of that oil is heavy condensate and not very helpful to lower prices.
This is happening as the Organisation of the Petroleum Exporting Countries and its influential energy partners jointly known as OPEC+ made no move to calm the market as it stick to the return of 400,000 barrels per day for April.
OPEC+ has faced pressure from top consumers such as the US and India to pump more to reduce prices and aid the economic recovery but the group has resisted calls for speedier increases despite higher oil prices due.
Davos was Different this year
Kwara Disburses N1.7b For Projects
Lagos Seals Western Lodge Hotel In Ikorodu
How To Link Your MTN, Airtel, Glo, 9mobile Lines to NIN
How To Identify Fake Naira Notes
Sort Codes of GTBank Branches in Nigeria
NSE Market Capitalisation Sheds N76b as Sell‐offs Persist
FAAC: FG, States, LGs Share N655.18b in January
Copyright © 2021 BusinessPost
