Creative Bloq is supported by its audience. When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. Learn more
Nike seems to think so.
Nike claims some online retailers are selling swoosh-branded trainers and sneakers without permission, and is asking them to be destroyed. The problem is, these are NFTs of trainers and sneakers, so how the heck does that work?
NFTs, or non-fungible tokens, are unique digital assets that are registered on a blockchain; they can’t be replaced by something else which creates a scarcity. We explain it all in our feature, What are NFTs?. Generally, an NFT is immutable, which means it will exist on the blockchain forever. Which raises a big problem for brands such as Nike that want to destroy fakes.
Just when we’re getting our heads around the ever-changing world of NFTs a new issue arises, and it’s actually fascinating. If Nike can legally take control of the alleged fake NFTs it could ‘burn’ them – send the asset to an inaccessible address, technically removing it from circulation.
It’s not the same as destroying fake Nike trainers in real life, and they will still exist. In this case it’s Detroit-based StockX, a site that legitimately enables customers to buy and sell used Nike trainers. Now it’s selling NFTs, what StockX calls Vault NFTs, of the same shoes (Nike Dunk, Jordan 1, etc).
In its defence StockX says the NFTs are receipts customers can cash-in to purchase their trainers. Nike doesn’t hold the same view. As reported by Reuters in its complaint filed last month in a New York federal court, Nike accused StockX of exploiting its brand for NFTs.
The StockX NFTs are minted on the Ethereum blockchain, and they can’t be deleted
Nike wants StockX to turn over all profits and the NFTs to be destroyed, which comes back to that tricky issue of how. The StockX NFTs are minted on the Ethereum blockchain, and they can’t be deleted. But as mentioned, they can be sent to a burner wallet, which is the equivalent of Nike seizing stock and locking it away in a warehouse – in this case, the NFTs will still exist but will be unavailable to be traded.
This case is a conundrum, and more will likely come as top brands attempt to take control of NFTs and the metaverse. It remains to be seen how a decentralised space can be controlled using traditional courts and copyright law.
Thank you for reading 5 articles this month* Join now for unlimited access
Enjoy your first month for just £1 / $1 / €1
*Read 5 free articles per month without a subscription
Join now for unlimited access
Try first month for just £1 / $1 / €1
Ian Dean is Editor, Digital Arts & Design at Creative Bloq. Ian is the former editor of many leading magazines, including digital art focused ImagineFX and 3D World and leading video game title Official PlayStation Magazine. Ian launched the magazine X360 in 2005 and has relaunched many others. In his early career Ian wrote for music and film magazines, including Uncut, SFX, and assisted on The Idler. With over 25 years’ experience in both print and online journalism, Ian has worked on many leading video game and digital art brands. With a passion for video games and art, Ian combines his loves to bring the latest news on NFTs, video game art and tech, and more to Creative Bloq. In his spare time he doodles in Corel Painter, ArtRage, and Rebelle while finding time to play Xbox and PS5.
Sign up below to get the latest from Creative Bloq, plus exclusive special offers, direct to your inbox!
Thank you for signing up to Creative Bloq. You will receive a verification email shortly.
There was a problem. Please refresh the page and try again.
Creative Bloq is part of Future plc, an international media group and leading digital publisher. Visit our corporate site.
© Future Publishing Limited Quay House, The Ambury, Bath BA1 1UA. All rights reserved. England and Wales company registration number 2008885.